Whoa, where did 2011 go? I suppose time seeming to run in fast forward when you have a baby for the first time is just an inevitability, but man, that really snuck up on me.
Looking back over what I posted in 2011, I count about 32 posts, not including my weekly auto-posting of “Tweets of the Week” that gives me (and others if they’re interested) an overview of things (thoughts, pictures, links, etc) that seemed worthy of mention. That doesn’t quite hit the 1/week rhythm I’d like to keep up with, but didn’t fall below 1/every other week either. Hoping for some more consistency here in 2012. We’ll see
As I survey what I did post, I spent a lot of time writing about theological education from a missiological perspective (initially in March, April, and May and then in a more focused manner in August, October, November, and December). The bulk those thoughts got encapsulated in a paper and video that I had the opportunity to contribute to that will hopefully continue to spur on some conversation over at thefutureoftheologicaleducation.com.
Theological Education wasn’t the only thing I wrote about however. Among other things…
So if that’s a brief look back, what’s in view with a look ahead? Near as I can tell, 2012 will be punctuated by three major developments.

As of the first year, I’ve resigned my position at Northern Seminary in order to begin working with a new initiative named the Missio Alliance (no website quite yet, but it’s coming). The basic purpose of the initiative is to bring together a cadre of theological and missiological voices from various streams of evangelicalism in order to begin to offer training and resources for the theological and pastoral formation of Christian leaders. I’m excited about this opportunity not just because I’ll find the work personally gratifying, but because I think there is a major need for an initiative like this, one that seeks to be theologically centrist, relationally oriented, and structured around the tight integration of theology and practice. If this sounds like something you’re interested in knowing more about or participating in, don’t hesitate to drop me a line.

For over a year now we’ve had the sense that God might be calling us to give more of our attention and energy to the people and needs of Elgin. We are just as enamored with our church community, Life on the Vine, as we have ever been. But, a huge part of what it means to be committed to the vision of Life on the Vine is maintaining a sense of openness to God’s leading for mission and this is what we feel like we’re responding to in faith. While what this might mean is still very much up for discernment with others (including the pastors of LOV, our close friends, and those we feel like God has brought into our lives as friends and partners here in Elgin), our sense is that God is leading us to begin cultivating what we would call a “missional community” – a group of 20-50 others who identify with a common sense of mission and seek to invest in one another through common rhythms and practices around that mission.

Amy and I have talked about adoption for several years now, since before we were married as a matter of fact. The big questions for us have been, “when will be a good time?” “and “where might we adopt from?” We are still talking, praying, and asking questions about the various factors to consider in terms of domestic vs. international adoption, but at this point it’s fair to say that this is something we feel committed to and will perhaps formally begin the process of here in 2012. Potentially, this could even mean moving to another home in Elgin that offers the kind of space that we might need as we consider getting a home study done.
——
I’m sure that I’ll be posting much more about all of these things through this next year, but for those of you beautiful people that regularly ask what’s going on and how you might pray for us, near as I can tell, these are the things that will factor most substantively into the shape of life for the Rozko’s for the next 12 months.
Way back in May of 2006 I wrote a blog post titled, “Things I Never Thought.” It was basically my own reflection on how the trajectory of my life had taken shape in ways that I didn’t expect or plan for. I had a number of friends mention that they appreciated the post when it was randomly retweeted from the archives so I thought I would do another post along the same lines, almost five years later now.
In May of 2006 I was in the Spring quarter of grad school. I was taking Pentateuch w/ Dr. John Goldingay, Theology of Christian Community w/ Dr. Ray Anderson and doing a Directed Study in Narrative Theology w/ Dr. Ryan Bolger. I had just one more quarter to go and then I was going to graduate. As I thought about my future, I imagined heading in one of two directions. Either I would move back to Canton and re-establish myself in the community I had left behind and missed like crazy, or, if God didn’t direct that way, I would look for a pastoral position in either the Pacific NW or in the Northeastern part of the US – some place that was further along in terms of being a Post-Christian context.
I never thought I would wind up working for Fuller’s MAGL program. I didn’t even know we had an MAGL program, but the opportunity presented itself and it radically altered my life. This will come into sharper focus below, but suffice it to say here, the model of theological education espoused by the MAGL and the relationships I made internally have had a tremendous impact on the contours of my life through to today.
I worked with the MAGL program for most of 2007 and then various circumstances combined to lead me back to Canton. As I tried to discern a future related to engaging the missional church conversation in the Midwest, I connected with Dave Fitch for the first time and visited Life on the Vine. I was giving serious consideration to simply moving to Chicago just to be a part of LOV as the first church I had been exposed to that I felt like was actually expressing missional theology in its communal life, rhythms, and practices.
I never thought I would get a call from a young church in Memphis, TN asking me to consider taking a position down there. And I certainly never thought that despite my best efforts to dismiss it, that God would actually lead me to embrace the opportunity.
I had a good experience at Living Hope. I loved the staff, enjoyed connecting and working with young adults, and made some life-long friends. I moved into mid-town, close to the part of the city where it seemed like some people from the church would think about relocating to, and anticipated a long future of investing the future of the newer church community that was seeking to embrace a missional identity and a heart for the city of Memphis.
I never thought that I would reconnect (let alone marry!) with Amy Garrington, who had been a student in one of the MAGL cohorts that I was responsible for. (See, told you that MAGL job was a big deal!) But, as she was contemplating leaving Pasadena for a position at International Teams near Chicago, that’s exactly what happened. We’ve been married for about a year and a half, have a baby on the way this June, and love where we live. Amy and I both have some family that lives in the Chicagoland area, but…
I never thought my brother would leave NYC and join us here in Chicago!
There’s probably a bunch more “I never thought’s” that I could list out, but these are probably among the most significant of the last five years. They serve as both a humble reminder and constant encouragement that when you’re more focused on listening and responding to what God is saying and doing than on ensuring the fulfillment of your own ideas and plans, life-changing surprises await you.
I simply can’t wait for the next series of, things I never thought!
Inasmuch as politics is a process by which groups of people make collective decisions regarding the way in which life ought to be lived, the Church is a thoroughly political entity. Taken together with the biblical reality of God’s Lordship over all of creation, it’s unfortunate that so many professing believers would dichotomize between “church” and “politics.” As Christians, those who pledge their allegiance to the Kingdom of God under the Lordship of Jesus, everything we do is political.

Lots of voting took place here in the US the other day and both in person and virtually, I found myself engrossed in conversations surrounding, not the issues/people which were to be voted on, but the practice of voting itself.
I devoted a more focused post to this topic a couple years ago, but I wanted to add another thought that came up in the midst of these conversations. To be clear, I’m not saying that it’s flat out and always wrong to vote. I am saying that we do well to recognize exactly what democratic voting entails for those of us seeking to differentiate ourselves from others as citizens of another Kingdom.
One of the reasons Christians may choose to not vote is that we are first and foremost part of a community that roots its identity in what I would call an invitational politics. That is to say, following Jesus, our fundamental political posture toward the world is to invite people into a way of seeing and engaging life that is rooted in the good news of God’s Kingdom.
The democratic process of voting, on the other hand, is anti-invitational. It is (at best) 51% of a given population mandating that the other 49% conform to their particular political bents.
Therefore, if we are to vote in democratic elections, we must concede that we are participating in a political process which runs against the grain of God’s ultimate desire for us.
Jesus does not coerce or force people into his vision for the world. He (and his disciples after him) live into that reality and invite others to experience it and do the same. Like Jesus, we opt “to serve” others (and invite them to do the same) rather than “to be served” by voting our preferences so that others are compelled to obey. Christians are those who are willing, in all matters and affairs to be counted among “the least” instead of using worldly power and influence to “lord it over” others.
There is a flawed logic at work in our dominant political vision. It would have us believe that the future of the world and its peoples is in our hands and we therefore have a responsibility to vote to determine our future. Sadly, this vision completely ignores the far greater reality held out to us in Scripture that God is in charge of the course of history and is at work in Christ to “bring everything under his control.” Does this mean we just sit back and relax because God is in charge? No! Instead, the gospel of the Kingdom offers to us an alternative political reality and responsibilities.
In humility and weakness we die for that which is right before we ever dream of killing for it. And we invite!
We speak with courage and boldness of the sovereignty of God and his righteousness. And we invite!
We embody the truth we claim to believe – trusting that the truth itself and not our persuasiveness will win the day. And we invite!
We run to the rescue of the poor and oppressed – we spend our lives on their behalf. And we invite!
We invite, we invite, we invite! And we pray to God that in the midst of our stumbling attempts to embody the sort of Kingdom reality held out to us in Scripture, that others see forgiveness, they see generosity, they see sacrificial living and a refusal to repay evil with evil and God draws them. This is the sort of political reality and responsibility that God calls us in to as citizens of his Kingdom.
Looking forward to some discussion around this topic. Let’s keep it civil and be open-minded with one another, eh?
**I owe everyone an update on our support raising effort for the Lausanne Congress in South Africa that’s coming up in October and I promise to do that soon, but I wanted to throw out some exciting news regarding my career path first.
Tomorrow, I will begin in a new role as Associate Director of Advancement for Northern Seminary. In this PT position, I will be cultivating relationships with alumni and other supporters of the school and its mission. On top of this, I have been hired as a communications consultant to do Internet Presence Management for the school and its programs. Among other things, I’ll be creating and maintaining social networks for the school and its programs.

For those of you who have been tracking with us personally, I want to try and articulate how Amy and I see this evolution of things.
When Amy and I got engaged (Feb. ’09), we knew that it was going to mean one of us leaving a job that we loved. I was a pastor to young adults in Memphis and she was a mobilizer for International Teams here in Elgin. Through much prayer and support, I resigned my position and moved up here to Chicago (May. ’09).
Though I’ve applied to no less than 36 jobs in the last year (3/month!), the bulk of my time has been given to largely unsolicited opportunities that have come my way and, I believe, have paved the way to this new position and consulting work.
Over the last year I was asked to teach a class for Fuller Theological Seminary, TA a class for Talbot School of Theology, build web sites and create communication pieces for International Teams, do quality control work for christianaudio.com, lead an alumni project for Northern Seminary, write articles for Jovia Web Studio, and assist on Information Architecture projects with Uzify.
The structure of our first year of marriage has been non-traditional I suppose. Amy has worked full-time while I looked for work and gave my time and attention to these contractual jobs that just kept coming my way. It’s very true that she’s been incredibly supportive and my biggest cheerleader. She was often upset on my behalf when I was passed over for a position. But I don’t want to paint a picture that the last year has been a struggle. Quite the contrary, we’ve quite enjoyed the structure of our life for the last year and the flexibility it’s brought.
For us, my saying yes to these new opportunities isn’t so much the end of a year long search for a job as much as it is another step in our ongoing attempt to be open and faithful to God’s work in our lives. I am receiving these job opportunities not as relief after a year of drought, but as a new kind of gift in an ongoing succession of the same.
Having this sort of posture toward God and God’s work has been incredibly formative for us and it instills in us an even greater sense of excitement and anticipation for the future. To all those who have been praying for us, your labors have brought us not to a finish line, but simply to yet another stage in a life-long race of openness, faithfulness, and discernment. We thank you for that.
If you haven’t come across Mr. Deity yet, you ought to check it out and subscribe via iTunes. If nothing else, it’s a fascinating window into the social standing of the Christian faith.
Thought it was interesting that shortly after posting previously, I made it around to watching the most recent episode. Anxious for your thoughts.
The Short Answer:
It’s a biblical/theological decision that has to do with conscience (1 Cor. 10:31-33) and not the candidates themselves

The longer, but hopefully more interesting answer:
As I did 4 years ago, I have toiled and prayed over this decision for months and have not come to it lightly. But, for the life of me, when I try to envision Jesus living here and now, I just can’t see him walking into an election booth. Others have no problem with this vision, many of them even have no problem stating for sure just which box he’d tick, but the Jesus I encounter in the gospels refused to capitulate to the political parties of his day and in trying to follow him, I am simply more interested in charting a different course altogether and inviting others along.
Tim Kumfer, in his brilliant article, “Between Sojourners and the Simple Way? Rethinking Radical Evangelical Politics in ’08 with John Howard Yoder” says,
A majority of the church in the United States still assumes that voting is one of the most meaningful ways Christians can engage themselves politically. This assumption is Constantinian; it assumes that politics for Christians is primarily about ensuring that society is headed our way…the problem occurs when we are more concerned with managing this realm than witnessing to a different one.
This mentality was perfectly embodied just the other day as I listened to a gentleman speak to a large crowd, encouraging them to vote for whichever candidate they thought would most ensure freedom of religious rights for Christians. I find this sort of thinking to be positively debilitating to the character of the Church. To think for a moment that the Church would believe that its ability to function had anything whatsoever to do with government protected rights is just the sort of posture that led to the utter decimation of the people of God in the First Testament. A Church which looks to the government to protect its rights is in grave danger.
This really worries me. Not only because I live in a place where the reality of this assumption is thicker than I have ever experienced, but because I am not above falling prey to it.
As I understand the Bible, I would say that all those who follow Jesus are given freedom to vote if they choose, but nowhere do I sense that this is an obligation. There are typically two common biblical objections to this which I will try to respond to briefly.
The first is Jesus’ command, “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s.” (Mark 12:17) I actually think (ala NT Wright) that in classic Jesus fashion, this is an underhanded way of saying, “Caesar actually doesn’t have a right to anything since everything is God’s. So, if you want to pay taxes (or vote or otherwise participate in government), go right ahead, just don’t forget who you are ultimately accountable to.”
Others would quote Romans 13:1, “The authorities that exist have been established by God.” But I am reminded that secular governments, even democratic ones, are a result of people rejecting God (1 Sam. 8:7). Not rebelling against them is one thing – we made our bed and therefore must lie in it, but assuming they have a claim on our allegiance and participation is quite another.
Not voting is a way to remind myself (and hopefully others) of these things – that it is the church and the church alone which witnesses to a new world order – which is called to put on display in the here and now what God dreams for the new creation.
A few influences. Shane Claiborne wrote a good article entitled, “Advise Everyone… Endorse No One” that helped me to think about these issues.
As one with Anabaptist leanings, I was influenced, first in 2005, and again this year, by this article from John D. Roth, “Polls Apart.”
The words of Stanley Hauerwas in this article/audio were helpful.
As were David Fitch’s musings on, “Not Voting as an Act of Christian Discernment: Calling the Emerging Church Into a Different Kind of Faithfulness.”
Liked Mark Van Steenwyk’s thoughts here.
Finally, once again Derek Webb has come through on the bonus track of the re-release of Mockingbird (which you can get for free here), with “How Then Shall We Then Vote?”
It may very well be that my decision on this matter comes from having a weaker conscience than some others, but as it indeed is my conscience here I stand and can do no other.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download