Whoa, where did 2011 go? I suppose time seeming to run in fast forward when you have a baby for the first time is just an inevitability, but man, that really snuck up on me.
Looking back over what I posted in 2011, I count about 32 posts, not including my weekly auto-posting of “Tweets of the Week” that gives me (and others if they’re interested) an overview of things (thoughts, pictures, links, etc) that seemed worthy of mention. That doesn’t quite hit the 1/week rhythm I’d like to keep up with, but didn’t fall below 1/every other week either. Hoping for some more consistency here in 2012. We’ll see
As I survey what I did post, I spent a lot of time writing about theological education from a missiological perspective (initially in March, April, and May and then in a more focused manner in August, October, November, and December). The bulk those thoughts got encapsulated in a paper and video that I had the opportunity to contribute to that will hopefully continue to spur on some conversation over at thefutureoftheologicaleducation.com.
Theological Education wasn’t the only thing I wrote about however. Among other things…
So if that’s a brief look back, what’s in view with a look ahead? Near as I can tell, 2012 will be punctuated by three major developments.

As of the first year, I’ve resigned my position at Northern Seminary in order to begin working with a new initiative named the Missio Alliance (no website quite yet, but it’s coming). The basic purpose of the initiative is to bring together a cadre of theological and missiological voices from various streams of evangelicalism in order to begin to offer training and resources for the theological and pastoral formation of Christian leaders. I’m excited about this opportunity not just because I’ll find the work personally gratifying, but because I think there is a major need for an initiative like this, one that seeks to be theologically centrist, relationally oriented, and structured around the tight integration of theology and practice. If this sounds like something you’re interested in knowing more about or participating in, don’t hesitate to drop me a line.

For over a year now we’ve had the sense that God might be calling us to give more of our attention and energy to the people and needs of Elgin. We are just as enamored with our church community, Life on the Vine, as we have ever been. But, a huge part of what it means to be committed to the vision of Life on the Vine is maintaining a sense of openness to God’s leading for mission and this is what we feel like we’re responding to in faith. While what this might mean is still very much up for discernment with others (including the pastors of LOV, our close friends, and those we feel like God has brought into our lives as friends and partners here in Elgin), our sense is that God is leading us to begin cultivating what we would call a “missional community” – a group of 20-50 others who identify with a common sense of mission and seek to invest in one another through common rhythms and practices around that mission.

Amy and I have talked about adoption for several years now, since before we were married as a matter of fact. The big questions for us have been, “when will be a good time?” “and “where might we adopt from?” We are still talking, praying, and asking questions about the various factors to consider in terms of domestic vs. international adoption, but at this point it’s fair to say that this is something we feel committed to and will perhaps formally begin the process of here in 2012. Potentially, this could even mean moving to another home in Elgin that offers the kind of space that we might need as we consider getting a home study done.
——
I’m sure that I’ll be posting much more about all of these things through this next year, but for those of you beautiful people that regularly ask what’s going on and how you might pray for us, near as I can tell, these are the things that will factor most substantively into the shape of life for the Rozko’s for the next 12 months.
Just a quick note to lifeasmission readers out there. A few weeks ago someone contacted me to let me know that my category pages were broken. If you read this mainly in a feed reader and don’t click through to the blog itself, I have all my posts categorized across the themes of: Bible & Theology, Church & Culture, Life & Mission. Under those categories are a bunch others, but clicking on any of them was just displaying an error page. I tracked down the error to one particular plugin, deactivated it, and we seem to be back in business.
Anyway, just in case you’re looking to shuffle through some previous content on the blog (since I am quite the slacker in terms of producing new content these days.. sorry), have at it!
Well, taking stock, it looks like I managed 120 posts this past year, 10/month. Last year I reflected on my favorite post from each month, but this year I thought I’d just go ahead and share what other people apparently found most interesting.
In order of the number of times viewed, the top 10 posts of 2010 were…
1) Transitioning Traditional Churches into Missional Ones
2) Alan Hirsch – Making Missional Marketable
3) NT Wright and the Emerging Church
4) What is the Emergent Church?
6) We Need WAY More Missional Conversations: A Response to Ed Stetzer
7) Discipleship in a Missional Context
8) Anabaptist Missional Ecclesiology – Doctor of Missiology
9) Launching Missional Communities (Book Review)
10) Tending to Eden: Environmental Stewardship for God’s People (Book Review)
There were actually 3 posts that should have featured in the list above based on the number of times they were viewed this year, but since they were written before 2010 I didn’t include them. They were…
1) This is Why I Love Stanley Hauerwas (this is actually from 2008 – lots of people googling Stan the Man!)
2) Justice is What Love Looks Like in Public (also from 2008 – a very popular quote)
3) Preaching in the Missional Church
By the way my favorite post of 2010 – that’ll be up tomorrow!
This is a piece that my friend Jason Coker wrote recently. I linked to it in other places, but it’s so good that I wanted to repost it in its entirety. Visit Jason’s blog for more of his excellent insights and writing. You might even consider supporting him and his family in terms of the ministries and projects they help lead by becoming a member of his blog community. Here’s the post…
She sank more and more into uneasy delirium. At times she shuddered, turned her eyes from side to side, recognised everyone for a minute, but at once sank into delirium again. Her breathing was hoarse and difficult, there was a sort of rattle in her throat.
~ Fyodor Dostoevsky. Crime and Punishment
Dear Fyodor,
It’s getting rough for the old girl. Despite the rattle of death in her chest, there’s still a hint of the former beauty and dignity behind those eyes and, as anyone would tell you, she’s as feisty as ever. Still, the truth is she’s dying and there’s nothing to be done about it. As we sit around her bed praying and waiting, her moments of lucidity come with rapidly decreasing frequency.
Everyone here is dealing with the ugliness of her death in their own way. My sister refuses to let her go. She stands just beyond the door, arguing in harsh whispers with the doctors and nurses. She won’t believe the facts of the case, and it’s easier to argue over the interpretation of charts and data than to look straight at the old girl herself. I don’t blame her. Looking is hard.
My older brother looks but doesn’t see. “She’s just a little out of shape,” he says optimistically. “If we can get her up and out she’ll be back to her old self, ruling the roost!” And so he hangs a dress on her and rolls on rouge and glides her round the ward in a wheelchair festooned at the handles with curly ribbon and helium balloons so she might speak with the people. I tell you it’s horrible. Such a thing would be bearable (commendable even!) if compassion was his aim, but it’s not compassion he seeks from her fellows in the ward. No, it’s her rulership he hopes to re-animate and so he props her up like some animatronic relic – a broken-down ecclesiastical Chuck-E-Cheese promising fun-and-games for all the good little children.
Sadly, she scares the children. They weren’t around when she was bright and beautiful. They never attended her grand parties. They don’t know who she was (and let’s face it, as good as she might have been she was also a hard taskmaster, perhaps taking her job of keeping us safe too seriously and – I think – secretly hoping we would never grow up). So the children shrink and shriek and their lack of piety (or pity) has fermented my brother’s optimism into a swill of bitter insistence, rendering him defensive and defiant and refusing the temporary inebriation of grief.
(Can I tell you the truth? I fear her death is more than he can take. He always seemed the stronger one growing up, but I’m not sure he can keep his sanity without her strict order around the house – without her barbed-wire fences to separate the wild vines from the cultivated ones. I don’t think he realizes it was always her intention that we harvest the whole field, and I think all these years later she might even be happy to see us tear down those fences if keeping them meant letting the whole field go to waste.)
For me, it’s her delirious rants that are the most heart-wrenching. She’ll stubbornly hoist herself up to rebuke people who aren’t even in the room – resurrected memories of conflicts and passions long dead and gone to everyone but her own cruelly vivid memories that now, in her mortal distress, seem to have taken on a quality that simply overwhelms her present reality. Perhaps it’s for the best – perhaps it’s mercy – but for better or worse I find I’m not just grieving her death, I’m grieving the robbery of her chance to see the transcendence of death by the legacy she leaves in us. I think she would rejoice in that. I think she would look us in the eye and say, “It’s good to grieve me, but celebrate too. If I live on like this then death wins by making me into a mockery of life. But if I die then the life I lived will be victorious by passing on to you. Now take the best and go.”
She deserves that moment; it’s her birthright. But we won’t let her have it. We insist on preserving her because somehow we think our life is in her, when actually her life (all life!) is a gift that grows in the giving, until one day it grows so fat it swallows every one of us whole, death and all. Who would have thought, Fyodor, that the nihilism you so strenuously decried would lead not to the depraved insistence on rationalized death, but to the dogmatic insistence on irrational life?
You must be wondering how she can possibly endure for so long. It’s the machines that keep her alive. Pray for a death rattle in the chest of those monstrosities so she might finally be free from our obsessions, and enjoy a long night of rest in a well-deserved sleep.
I’ve been wanting to do some blog redesign for some time and while my wife being out of the country for 10 days is not something I’ve enjoyed, it has given me some time to make some changes.

So what have we got?
New background, new header, some new colors, an updated intro and connecting blurb, and all my posts categorized under the general headings of, “Bible & Theology, “Church & Culture, “Life & Mission.”
The changes aren’t quite as revolutionary as I had hoped when I started, but it feels freshened up a bit and I taught my self some new CSS & HTML stuff.
If you tend to just read my posts in a reader, I hope you’ll click through and let me know if you notice any errors on your end.
In case you missed it before, I am doing all of this on top of a cool theme that my friend Todd built. If you are looking for a great WordPress theme and a cool guy to work with, give Todd a shout.
I am fortunate to get to instruct an online course entitled, “The Emerging Church in the 21st Century,” for Fuller Theological Seminary each year. Based on current discussions and publications, I try to make appropriate and helpful updates to the course each time around. This year, I decided to make Brian McLaren’s newest book, A New Kind of Christianity: Ten Questions that are Transforming the Faith, an optional book choice (students have to read something by McLaren).

After I made this decision, a flurry of reviews of the book were published all over the blogosphere. I was disappointed that a great many of them paid no mind to the life and ministry of the author and were virtually completely devoid of charity, something which ought to mark all Christian discourse. More than this, I was thwarted in my effort to find reviews that offered reflections that were practical in nature.
Convinced that there is a better way to engage with the material of Christian authors, I created an alternative assignment, which about half of the class has chosen to participate in. I created a blog, dearbrianmclaren.wordpress.com, and invited students to write a personal letter to Brian. Here’s the criteria for the assignment and grading:
1) Letter must be addressed to Brian as the author of the book and should be between 500-600 words.2) You must speak to the practical implications of Brian’s content for your own life and ministry – no abstract, hypothetical or theoretical speculation. If taken seriously, what are the implications of Brian’s points and proposals for your church or how you live and minister? Obviously, you will have to be selective and won’t be able to address everything in the book, that’s fine.3) The degree to which you write with Christian charity. You are welcome, even encouraged, to disagree with anything (or everything!) Brian has to say, that’s not the point. The point is showing that you can disagree and respond to an actual person with Christian charity.5) Included within the letter, or at the end, you should pose 2-3 questions to Brian that you are left with after reading the book.4) Provided enough people are reviewing the book in this manner, you must comment on at least three other peoples letters/posts within a week of their being posted on the blog.
These letters have been posted and Brian has even been gracious enough to give some time to reading and responding to them. Though this is primarily a class assignment, the blog is public and I’d encourage you to read the letters and offerer comments if you choose.
Even better, if you’ve read the book, I’d invite to you respond along the lines of the guidelines above and leave a link to your letter in the comments below.