This afternoon Amy and I are joining about a dozen others from our church community as attenders at a Missional Learning Commons in Ft. Wayne, IN.

At the invitation of Dave Fitch (who has blogged about this gathering here), I attended my first one of these in December of 2007 before Amy was in Chicago. Last year Amy attended without me as I was in Kenya. So, especially since we have committed as a couple to helping cultivate a new missional community in the next year, I am really excited for us to get to participate in one of these together.
Here’s what I love about this event.
A) It’s free. And that’s not because it sucks. It’s because the “business” of Christian resourcing needs to die.
B) It’s local. The people who attend these every year have a real chance to stay meaningfully connected.
C) It’s not about personalities. Those who speak, are more like conversation starters. There is much more time given to dialogue than monologue.
D) There’s no hype. No book sales, no t-shirts, no vendors.
It’s just a band of brothers and sisters who are trying get on the same page about the implications of a missional ecclesiolgy as Christendom continues to crumble here in the midwest. It’s a living example of what I meant when I blogged about “The Power and Promise of Regional Gatherings for the Equipping of Missional Churches.”
Looking forward to a great weekend of connecting, discussing, dreaming, and praying.
Just got done listening to Father Richard Rohr on the Homebrewed Christianity podcast (itunes link).


He said two of the greatest things I think I’ve ever heard..
The first isn’t original to him.
Truth is so needed at this point in history that it can only be entrusted to people of love.
The second is a direct quote.
I’m not trying to promote relativistic thinking; in fact, just the opposite. I’m all for the journey toward truth, but too many people’s truth comes too soon, too quick, and it’s too filled with them.
I wonder if we can even conceive of an expression of Christian faith where Christ-like love and spiritual maturity are understood as basic prerequisites for the handling of truth?
In a new book, Fresh + Re:Fresh: Church Planting and Urban Mission in Canada Post-Christendom, Dave Fitch offers an introductory chapter entitled, “Fifty Years of Church Planting: the Story as I See it…” in which he summarizes the dominant approaches to church planting over the last few decades and discusses some of the major differences within Post-Christendom.

In speaking of the differences in the multiplication of church communities in Christendom vs. Post-Christendom, Fitch says,
Among the new missional leaders, church is the name we give to a way of life, not a set of services. We do not plant an organized set of services; we inhabit a neighborhood as the living embodied presence of Christ.
In agreement, I’d say that “cultivating missional communities” might be a better way to describe what we have more often known as “church planting.” In that vein, Fitch goes on to talk about the sorts of leaders necessary to cultivate missional communities suggesting that…
– they will be survivors
…the new missional community leaders must have patience, steady faithfulness and the ability to live simply. They must be able to get jobs and not see the ministry as a privileged full time vocation. They must have a mental image of how they are going to sustain their lives financially, relationally, spiritually and personally.
– they will be communal shepherds
They are not starting and managing an organization. They may not even be good at organization. Instead they are cultivating a communal sense of mission identity among a gathering people ‘for this time and place.’
– they will be interpretive leaders
Interpretive leaders do not dictate from the pulpit a list of do’s and don’ts and solutions from God for every problem. They interpret the Scriptures to open our eyes to what God is doing and where He is taking us. In other words, they cultivate other interpreters/listeners.
– they will be directors of spiritual formation
We must ever navigate against putting on a show that will attract; rather we must develop a liturgy that is simple, accessible and Scriptural and that guides our lives into Christ and guards us from the distractions that would take us away from Mission. …there will be no missional community of people formed and shaped for mission if we just preach Mission as a legalistic requirement. Mission requires patience, a sense of vision and a level of self-denial that can only be formed inwardly in living bodies, trained in the simple organic disciplines/liturgies of the historic church.
– they will be leaders who give away power
Hierarchy is the product of Christendom. It hails to a day when Christianity still held power in society… It is my belief therefore that missional leadership needs always to be multiple. Most missional pastors/leaders need to be bi-vocational (bi-ministerial) for their own survival. Such leaders must learn to mutually submit to the other leaders as they guide the journey of the community. They must mutually learn to mentor leaders and give away power.
A final insight from the chapter is this little gem,
This kind of leader often does not come from our (all too often) modernist seminaries. They are grown in a community which gathers to worship the Triune God so as to discern Him at work in our midst. (my thoughts on that here)
Beginning the year with this post is no coincidence. Amy and I have committed to serve alongside others from Life on the Vine to help cultivate a new missional community in 2010. There’s a lot more questions than answers at this point, but we’re excited to see what God might do as we make ourselves available.
While I am sure to offer tid bits on this process on the blog from time to time, if you would like to get the inside scoop on a regular basis as someone who would commit to be praying for us, leave a comment or let us know through the contact page. Peace to you in the New Year and thanks for your prayers & support.