• Toward A Missional Vision of Theological Education: Contextual Training

    December 16, 2009

    Previous posts in this Series:

    Preliminary Thoughts | The Root of the Problem | The Fruit of the Problem | New Soil | Community Rootedness | Character Formation | Conviction Shaping

    I have tried to make a case that a missional vision of theological education is one rooted in community that emphasizes the formation of Christan character marked by Kingdom convictions. I would further suggest that a missional vision of theological education will seek to train leaders contextually.

    This is missiology 101.  Urban ministry is different than suburban.  Ministry amongst the poor is different than ministry amongst the affluent.  Ministry with adolescents is different than ministry with senior citizens.  Traditional theological education, however, is not equipped to train people with these nuances in mind.  The dominant expression of theological education within Christendom has been training at geographically specific institutions.  These schools of course bring their own context to bear on the training they are doing, but are necessarily limited by that same feature.  Geography isn’t the only problem, the very model of education employed in the seminary environment distances, if not outright separates, theological education from contextual factors.  Some schools have begun trying to correct this problem through online education, allowing students to continue serving in their present context while doing intensive biblical & theological study.  As I said here, these innovations within the current system of theological education are helpful, but they aren’t aimed at the other aspects of missional theological education that I have already covered.  So, the question before us is,

    Within a missional vision of theological education, how will contextual leadership development take place?

    I can think of at least three aspects of a beginning answer to that question.

    1) Networks

    Church networks are the missional answer to the decay of denominations. For good or for bad, denominations are crumbling.  In an era of post’s (post-modernity, post-Christendom, etc.) you can add to the list post-denominationalism.  Springing up in their place are inter-denominational networks of churches.  In my opinion, the best of these are striving to make a shared vision of missional living more central than individual points of doctrine.  Besides always being rooted in a particular context, the realities of globalization and pluralism mean that no one congregation has the capacity to train leaders for the church of the future by itself.  It must look outside.  If leaders are to be identified by local communities and if these same communities are to take primary responsibility for their holistic formation and contextual training, then meaningful involvement in a healthy network of missional churches through the sharing of resources and common ministry is a big part of how we accomplish the contextual training of leaders.

    2) Apprenticeship

    The most valuable resources to the spiritual formation & training of leaders are men and women who offer years of faithful service within a given context. Reading, writing, and peer discussion all have a vital place in the formation of missional church leaders, but all of these dimensions gain their final value in terms of their practical implications in a given context.  Seasoned leaders are invaluable in helping to achieve this goal.  Cultivating missional church leaders who have the skills necessary to help a body of people understand the gospel and its implications in contextually appropriate ways calls for a mentor-apprentice(s) dimension to any process of theological education.

    3) Civic Engagement

    Civic engagement needs to increasingly become a hallmark of both missional church ministry and leadership formation.  Immersion has long been a defining mark of truly cross-cultural ministry.  Therefore, those churches who embrace the West as a mission field should immediately resonate with the idea that the best way to become incarnationally faithful is to immerse themselves in their context.  The reason for this is at least 2-fold 1) To discover where and how God is already at work. 2) To discern what incarnationally faithful witness to the gospel will mean and look like.

    If it’s not already obvious, this aspect of a missional vision of theological education is tied directly to the centrality of the Missio Dei for a missional ecclesiology.  A big part of what makes missional churches missional is their abdication of attractional approaches to church and ministry in favor of incarnational ones. All that Jesus said and did was said and done in light of the people he was speaking to and the place he was speaking in.  In both ministry and leadership formation, we do well to follow this pattern of contextual wisdom.

    What has your experience with contextual leadership training been?  Do you see other ways to accomplish this goal in or outside of traditional models of theological education?

    In my next post, I hope to round things off with some thoughts on cultural pioneering as a final mark of a missional vision of theological education.

    Posted in: christendom, church, community, gospel, Jesus, kingdom, leadership, missional, modernity, networking, postmodernity, spiritual formation, theological education, theology, western culture

Recent Comments

  • Jason Coker said...

    1

    Actually, this has largely been my own experience of theological/leadership training. In fact, I've often told people I was "apprenticed" into ministry.

    I functioned as a ministry leader for six years – progressing from volunteer, to part time staff to full time staff during that time – under the simultaneous instruction of three mentors in one church before pursuing anything like formal education.

    When I did finally seek formal training it was through a ministry school rooted in my association (which is, itself, more of a network than a denomination) that utilizes a relatively unique model: classes partner with and are conducted through local churches all over the US and UK, grounding the entire educational experience in local mission and ministry.

    After finishing that, I discovered a hunger for continuing education. Convinced I was called as a "missionary to the West," I sought a program that would train me for cross-cultural mission principles while allowing me to remain in my context. That's how I found the MAGL. Even though it's been a longer road, I wouldn't trade this path for anything. I feel I'm much more equipped as a leader for our unique times than I would have been otherwise.

    What I've missed out on, to some extent, in your proposal is Civic Engagement. While one of the two churches I served during this journey was highly "outreach oriented" – which was very important – both were still essentially Christendom-minded. The burdensome desire to be in a church that exists entirely for the sake of God's post-Christendom mission required that my wife and I forge out on our own and start one. In that sense, our education continues…and always will, I suppose.

    Having said all that, I'm not at all sure how we'll recapitulate this kind of experience for emerging leaders in our new church plant. The cultural ground underneath our feet is shaking and shifting so rapidly that I seriously doubt I could run people through the same set of processes – though, I have no doubt there will be other options when the time comes.

    12/17/09 9:31 PM | Comment Link

  • jrrozko said...

    2

    Sounds like you're one of the lucky ones. It's gonna take some strategic thinking and a good amount of patience, but I am convinced that structuring a process of education/formation like this is just too important to not invest our resources in.

    12/17/09 10:30 PM | Comment Link

Leave A Comment

Mail (will not be published) (required)